Objective Diplopia Outcomes for Patients Treated With Teprotumumab for Thyroid Eye Disease.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is a condition caused by inflammatory damage to the periocular tissue that often leads to double vision. Teprotumumab is an insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor antibody that was FDA approved for the management of TED in 2020, although much is yet to be elucidated regarding its effects on diplopia outcomes among patients with TED. Diplopia is a significant and life-altering effect of TED. Previous studies have reported the effect of teprotumumab on double vision subjectively using the Gorman diplopia score. However, there is a gap in the literature addressing the effect of teprotumumab treatment on objective ocular alignment measures. The purpose of our study was to address this gap. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who were diagnosed with TED, presented with diplopia, and treated with teprotumumab in a single-center academic ophthalmology practice. The primary outcome was change in ocular alignment in primary gaze position at 6 months (completion of teprotumumab treatment). Secondary outcomes included change in ocular alignment in other gaze positions, proptosis, eyelid position, and clinical activity score (CAS) at 6 months compared with baseline. To determine what factors may predict ocular alignment response to teprotumumab, we analyzed baseline characteristics among 3 groups, divided based on whether ocular alignment was worsened, stable, or improved at 6 months. RESULTS: Seventeen patients met inclusion criteria, 3 (18%) worsened, 10 (59%) were stable, and 4 (24%) improved. CAS ( P = 0.02) was significantly different among the groups and was higher in those who worsened and those who improved compared with those who remained stable. Right gaze horizontal prism deviation ( P = 0.01) and left gaze horizontal prism deviation ( P = 0.03) were significantly different among the groups, with a greater degree of left gaze horizontal prism deviation in the worse group than the stable group ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that most patients remained stable after teprotumumab treatment regarding ocular alignment in primary gaze and the number of patients who improved was slightly higher than the number of patients who worsened after teprotumumab treatment. There are some baseline measures, such as CAS and right and left gaze horizontal prism deviation that can help better predict how a patient will respond to teprotumumab treatment. Our results can better inform physicians of how to counsel patients with TED when considering teprotumumab therapy.

Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: This is an updated version of a Cochrane Review last updated in 2020. Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder, affecting 0.5% to 1% of the population. In nearly 30% of cases, epilepsy is resistant to currently available drugs. Pharmacological treatment remains the first choice to control epilepsy. Lamotrigine is a second-generation antiseizure medication. When used as an add-on (in combination with other antiseizure medications), lamotrigine can reduce seizures, but with some adverse effects. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of add-on lamotrigine, compared with add-on placebo or no add-on treatment in people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid) on 3 October 2022 with no language restrictions. CRS Web includes randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Specialised Registers of Cochrane Review Groups, including Epilepsy. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated add-on lamotrigine versus add-on placebo or no add-on treatment in people of any age with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. We used data from the first period of eligible cross-over trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: For this update, two review authors independently selected trials and extracted data. Our primary outcome was 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. Our secondary outcomes were treatment withdrawal, adverse effects, cognitive effects, and quality of life. Primary analyses were by intention-to-treat. We performed sensitivity best- and worse-case analyses to account for missing outcome data. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% Cls) for dichotomous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We identified no new studies for this update, so the results and conclusions of the review are unchanged. We included five parallel-group studies in adults or children, eight cross-over studies in adults or children, and one parallel study with a responder-enriched design in infants. In total, these 14 studies enroled 1806 eligible participants (38 infants, 199 children, 1569 adults). Baseline phases ranged from four to 12 weeks and treatment phases ranged from eight to 36 weeks. We rated 11 studies (1243 participants) at low overall risk of bias and three (697 participants) at unclear overall risk of bias due to lack of information on study design. Four studies (563 participants) reported effective blinding. Lamotrigine compared with placebo probably increases the likelihood of achieving 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.23; 12 trials, 1322 participants (adults and children); moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in risk of treatment withdrawal for any reason among people treated with lamotrigine versus people treated with placebo (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.37; 14 trials; 1806 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Lamotrigine compared with placebo is probably associated with a greater risk of ataxia (RR 3.34, 99% Cl 2.01 to 5.55; 12 trials; 1525 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), dizziness (RR 1.76, 99% Cl 1.28 to 2.43; 13 trials; 1768 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), nausea (RR 1.81, 99% CI 1.22 to 2.68; 12 studies, 1486 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and diplopia (RR 3.79, 99% Cl 2.15 to 6.68; 3 trials, 944 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in the risk of fatigue between lamotrigine and placebo (RR 0.82, 99% CI 0.55 to 1.22; 12 studies, 1552 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine as an add-on treatment for drug-resistant focal seizures is probably effective for reducing seizure frequency. Certain adverse effects (ataxia, dizziness, diplopia, and nausea) are probably more likely to occur with lamotrigine compared with placebo. There is probably little or no difference in the number of people who withdraw from treatment with lamotrigine versus placebo. The trials were of relatively short duration and provided no long-term evidence. In addition, some trials had few participants. Further trials are needed to assess the long-term effects of lamotrigine and to compare lamotrigine with other add-on drugs.

Diplopia after Sleeve Gastrectomy: The Canary in the Coal Mine.

Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE) is a neurologic emergency requiring timely intravenous thiamine supplementation to prevent permanent neurologic deficits. Historically, the WE diagnosis was limited to individuals with alcohol use disorder. However, it is now widely recognized to occur in patients who are chronically malnourished, post-bariatric surgery, pregnant with hyperemesis gravidarum, and with severe anorexia nervosa. Here we present a young woman who developed WE after undergoing a recent sleeve gastrectomy followed by protracted emesis for several days. This case underscores the importance of performing a thorough neurological review of systems and physical exam in high-risk patients and having a low clinical threshold to initiate appropriate thiamine treatment.

Cogan's sign in a patient with suspected post-COVID-19 vaccine-associated myasthenia gravis.

The Cogan's sign is indicative of myasthenia gravis. This is the first report of neurological signs in a patient with post-COVID-19 vaccine-associated myasthenia gravis in Brazil. In this case, a previously healthy 68-year-old woman presented with proximal limb weakness, left ptosis, and diplopia 1 month after receiving her fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Neurological examination revealed the presence of Cogan's sign, and she recovered rapidly after treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of myasthenia gravis associated with the COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil.

Efficacy and Safety of intravenous monoclonal antibodies in patients with moderate-to-severe active Graves'ophthalmopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Backgrounds: The effects of various treatments on Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) have been studied. As monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been proposed for the treatment of moderate to severe GO, direct comparisons between different mAbs are lacking.We therefore conducted this meta-analysis to objectively compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous mAbs. Methods: To identify eligible trials, references published before September 2022 were electronically searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Pubmed, Embase,Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI,Wan-Fang and ICTRP databases.The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool were used to assess the risk of bias of the original studies.The primary and secondary outcomes were the response and inactivation rates, with the secondary outcomes being the clinical activity score (CAS),the improvement of proptosis and diplopia improvement,and the adverse event rate. Publication bias was evaluated, along with subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Results: A total of 12 trials with 448 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that TCZ (tocilizumab) was most likely to be the best treatment in terms of response according to indirect contrast, followed by TMB (teprotumumab) and RTX (rituximab).TCZ, followed by TMB and RTX, was also most likely to be the best treatment in terms of reducing proptosis. In terms of improving diplopia, TMB was most likely to be the best treatment, followed by TCZ and RTX.TCZ was the highest probability of safety, followed by RTX and TMB. Conclusions: Based on the best available evidence,TCZ should be the preferred treatment for moderate to severe GO.In the absence of head-to-head trials,indirect comparisons of treatments are routinely used to estimate the effectiveness of the treatments of interest. In addition,the optimal dose and potential mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies remain to be established,and it is encouraging that the treatment paradigm for GO may change in the future.This study was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for conducting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)(27). Systematic Review Registration: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42023398170.

Myositis of the superior oblique muscle in a patient with suspected superior oblique muscle palsy.

Orbital myositis comprises a subtype of idiopathic orbital inflammation. Symptoms and clinical signs include orbital pain, eyelid swelling, ptosis, and conjunctival chemosis, sometimes concurrent with diplopia. Orbital myositis typically occurs in an idiopathic acute form and affects one or more extraocular muscles. It mainly involves the rectus muscles; cases involving the superior oblique muscle have been rarely reported. We report the case of a 57-year-old man with sudden-onset diplopia. Initial examination was suggestive of right superior oblique muscle palsy; however, myositis of the right superior oblique muscle was confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patient was started on intravenous steroid pulse treatment. The steroid was tapered for 4 months. Diplopia, exotropia, and excyclotorsion of the right eye disappeared after 3 weeks of treatment. Cranial MRI obtained 2 months after starting treatment showed a normal superior oblique muscle. There has been no recurrence with 8 months of follow-up after completing the steroid taper.

Reduction in Extraocular Muscle Cross-sectional Area and Correlation With Extraocular Motility and Diplopia Following Teprotumumab for Thyroid Eye Disease.

PURPOSE: To quantify changes in extraocular muscle (EOM) cross-sectional areas (CSA) on orbital imaging in patients with thyroid eye disease before and after teprotumumab treatment, and assess for correlation with clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included thyroid eye disease patients treated with teprotumumab who had pre- and post-treatment CT imaging. Reformatted oblique coronal images were created for each orbit in a plane perpendicular to the optic nerve. EOM CSA measurements were performed by 2 radiographic reviewers and averaged. Primary outcomes included change in ratio of total EOM to orbit CSA, and of each individual muscle group to orbit CSA, before and after treatment. Secondary outcomes included subanalysis based on age (≥40, <40 years) and Clinical Activity Score (CAS) (≥4, <4), and comparison with clinical outcomes including CAS, Hertel exophthalmometry, Gorman diplopia score, and extraocular motility. RESULTS: Forty-eight orbits of 24 patients (16 female, mean age 57.9 years) were included. There was a significant reduction in the total EOM to orbit CSA ratio ( p < 0.01) and for each individual rectus muscle to orbit CSA ratio ( p < 0.01 for all groups). Total EOM to orbit CSA ratios were reduced for 21 patients (87.5%); this was statistically significant in 13 patients (54.2%). There was significant improvement in CAS, proptosis, diplopia, and EOM motility ( p < 0.01 for all categories). There was a significant correlation between reduction of EOM CSA, and reduction of diplopia ( p < 0.01) and EOM motility ( p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: EOM CSA is significantly reduced following treatment with teprotumumab, and correlates with clinical findings including improvement in extraocular motility and diplopia.

Current management of myasthenia gravis in Belgium: a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: As new treatments are becoming available for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), it is worth reflecting on the actual status of MG treatment to determine which patients would most likely benefit from the new treatments. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical files of all MG patients seen at the Department of Neurology of the Antwerp University Hospital during the years 2019, 2020 and 2021. RESULTS: 163 patients were included. Age at diagnosis varied from the first to the eighth decades, with a peak of incidence from 60 to 70 years for both genders, and an additional peak from 20 to 30 years in women. Diplopia and ptosis were by far the most common onset symptom. At maximum disease severity, 24% of the patients still had purely ocular symptoms and 4% needed mechanical ventilation. 97% of the patients received a treatment with pyridostigmine and 68% with corticosteroids, often in combination with immunosuppressants. More than half reported side effects. At the latest visit, 50% of the patients were symptom-free. Also, half of the symptomatic patients were fulltime at work or retired with no or mild limitations in daily living. The remaining patients were working part-time, on sick leave, or retired with severe limitations. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The majority of MG patients are doing well with currently available treatments, but often at the cost of side effects in the short and in the long term. A significant group is in need of better treatments.

Botulinum toxin treatment for bielschowsky acquired commitant esotropia in adults.

BACKGROUND: Many researchers have noticed that there is an increasing trend of Bielschowsky acquired comitant esotropia (ACE) in recent years related to excessive near work, but the exact pathogenesis and treatment methods have not been reported yet. Therefore, we aimed to characterize the clinical features of this ACE in adults and to evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin (BTX) injections in these patients. METHODS: This was a prospective consecutive case series of 47 patients with Bielschowsky ACE. BTX was injected bilaterally into the medial rectus muscle of 45 patients, and twenty-seven of them (27/45) completed 10 months of follow-up after their last injection. Angle of deviation, fusion, stereopsis, subjective assessment of diplopia were documented before and after BTX treatment, and repeated measures data were compared by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test or Analysis of variance. The relationship between BTX dosage and corrected esotropia was explored by the Regression analysis. Meanwhile, possible risk factors for ACE including time spent on near work, refraction error, patients' personality, glasses wearing habits and duration of symptoms were recorded and analyzed with General Linear Models. RESULTS: The patients aged 32.32 ± 10.96 (range 15-53) years spent 8.34 ± 2.38 h on near work each day, and most myope habitually removed their glasses at near. Their chief complaint was distance diplopia, with more significant esotropia at distance (around 20 PD) than at near. This series of patients also exhibited perfectionist tendencies. However, most patients achieved orthophoria after BTX treatment, only with a mild residual esotropia (+ 3.96 ± 5.79 PD), which left them asymptomatic most of the time. CONCLUSION: This group of ACE patients was characterized by diplopia with more significant esotropia at distance. Besides excessive near-work, habitually removing myopic glasses and perfectionist tendencies may also contribute to this type of ACE. Fortunately, bilateral BTX injection safely and effectively reduced the esotropia with complete resolution of symptoms, especially for those treated at an early stage.

Rituximab for thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) is the most frequent extrathyroidal manifestation of Graves' disease, affecting up to 50% of patients. It has a great impact on quality of life. Rituximab (RTX) is a human/murine chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the CD20 receptor on B-lymphocytes. Preliminary work has shown that blocking this CD20 receptor with RTX may affect the clinical course of TAO by reducing inflammation and the degree of proptosis.  OBJECTIVES: This review update, originally published in 2013, assesses the efficacy and safety of using RTX for the treatment of TAO. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2022, Issue 2), which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database (LILACS), the ISRCTN registry, clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). There were no language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 22 February 2022.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of RTX administered by intravenous infusion using any dosage regimen for the treatment of active TAO in adults, compared to placebo or glucocorticoids treatment.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently scanned titles and abstracts, and screened full-text reports of potentially relevant studies. The outcomes of interest in this review were: clinical activity score (CAS), NOSPECS severity scale, proptosis (mm), palpebral aperture (mm), extraocular motility (degrees or diplopia rating scale), quality of life and adverse effects. MAIN RESULTS: We identified two studies that met the inclusion criteria in this updated review. Across both studies, the mean age of participants was 55 years and 77% were women. RTX compared to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) One study, conducted in Italy, compared RTX (n = 15 after one participant withdrew) with IVMP (n = 16) for active TAO (CAS ≥ 3 out of 7 or 4 out of 10). We judged this study to be at low risk of bias in most domains, but it was stopped early because of disease reactivation in the comparator group (5/16 participants). This study provided low-certainty evidence that RTX may result in CAS improvement at 24 weeks compared to IVMP (15/15 versus 12/16 improved by ≥ 2 points; risk ratio (RR) 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 1.78). Only very low-certainty evidence was available for the other outcomes: NOSPECS improvement by 2 or more classes (3/15 versus 3/16; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.25 to 4.49); proptosis improvement by 2 mm or more (0/15 versus 1/16; RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.02 to 8.08); palpebral aperture improvement by 3 mm or more (2/15 versus 0/16; RR 5.31, 95% CI 0.28 to 102.38); motility improvement by 1 class or more (3/15 versus 3/16; RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.25 to 4.49); and improvement on the Graves' ophthalmopathy QoL scale by at least 6 points for "functioning" (5/14 versus 8/13; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.32), and "appearance" (9/14 versus 6/13; RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.82). Adverse events were more common in the RTX group (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.13; low-certainty evidence). Minor adverse effects (mild infusion reactions) were observed in most people receiving RTX at first infusion. Two participants experienced a major infusion reaction, likely cytokine release syndrome. RTX compared to placebo One study, conducted in the USA, enrolled 25 participants with active TAO (CAS ≥ 4 out of 7), comparing RTX (13 participants) to placebo. We judged this study to be at low risk of bias in most domains, but it was stopped early due to recruitment issues. It provided very low-certainty evidence on the following outcomes at 24 weeks: CAS improvement by 2 or more points (4/13 RTX versus 3/12 placebo; RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.34 to 4.40); NOSPECS improvement by 2 or more classes (2/13 versus 2/12; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.15 to 5.56); proptosis improvement by 2 mm or more (2/13 versus 4/12; RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.10 to 2.08); palpebral aperture median change (0 mm in RTX group, in both eyes separately, versus -0.5 mm and 0.5 mm in placebo group right and left eye, respectively); motility median diplopia score (3 versus 2.5); SF-12 physical component median score (45.9 versus 40.3) and mental component median score (52.8 versus 46.1). More participants in the RTX group experienced adverse effects (8/13 versus 3/12; RR 2.46, 95% CI 0.84 to 7.18).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of RTX in people with TAO. Future studies investigating RTX in people with active TAO may need to be multi-centre in order to recruit enough participants to make an adequate judgement on the efficacy and safety of this novel therapy.

Antithymocyte Globulin as Second-Line Therapy in Graves Orbitopathy-Preliminary Results From a Prospective Single-Center Study.

Objective: Management of Graves' orbitopathy remains a challenge. Our previous case report has shown promising results for rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in the treatment of Graves' orbitopathy. Design: We present the response of 7 individuals with active moderate-to-severe steroid-resistant Graves' orbitopathy to rATG, representing preliminary results from a prospective single-center study. Methods: rATG was administered intravenously at a dose of 0.8-1.0 mg/kg daily (cumulative dose of 150-200 mg). The primary outcome measures at weeks 24 and 48 were ≥2-point reduction in Clinical Activity Score from baseline, a proptosis response, a diplopia response, and improvement of distant best-corrected visual acuity and mean retinal sensitivity. Key secondary outcomes included stabilization of ganglion cell complex thickness, a decrease of retinal nerve fiber layer in OCT, and a reduction in CD4/CD8 ratio and TRAb at 48 weeks. Results: An improvement in clinical activity score was observed in all patients, with disease inactivation in 3 cases. Proptosis reduction equal to or greater than 2 mm was noted for 8 of 10 eyes. Diplopia improved in three of 6 patients. There was an improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (from 0.69 to 0.78) and mean retinal sensitivity (from 20.8 to 23.5 dB). In addition, there was a long-lasting improvement in CD4/CD8 ratio in 6 patients. Two patients experienced adverse events (influenza and serum sickness). Conclusion: rATG therapy offers a long-lasting improvement in moderate-to-severe steroid-resistant Graves' orbitopathy with improvement in functional vision (reduction of diplopia, improvement of visual acuity, retinal sensitivity, and VEP pattern). The therapy is well-tolerated. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05199103.

Proptosis and Diplopia Response With Teprotumumab and Placebo vs the Recommended Treatment Regimen With Intravenous Methylprednisolone in Moderate to Severe Thyroid Eye Disease: A Meta-analysis and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.

IMPORTANCE: Thyroid eye disease can be a debilitating autoimmune disorder characterized by progressive proptosis or diplopia. Teprotumumab has been compared with placebo in randomized clinical trials, but not with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), which sometimes is used in clinical practice for this condition. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a matching-adjusted indirect comparison of teprotumumab vs IVMP vs placebo. DATA SOURCES: Deidentified patient-level data from teprotumumab trials and aggregate-level data from literature on the most recommended regimen of IVMP. STUDY SELECTION: PubMed and Embase were searched for randomized/observational studies using key terms and controlled vocabulary. Full texts of eligible articles were reviewed and cataloged. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Conducted by 1 reviewer (R.A.Q.) and 1 verifier (R.B.), including study characteristics, eligibility criteria, baseline characteristics, and outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Changes in proptosis by millimeter and diplopia response (percentage with ≥1 grade reduction) from baseline to week 12 in patients receiving IVMP and placebo, and to week 24 in patients receiving teprotumumab. RESULTS: The search identified 1019 records, and 6 through manual searches, alerts, and secondary references. After excluding duplicates and screening full-text records, 12 IVMP studies were included in the matching-adjusted indirect comparison (11 for proptosis change [n = 419], 4 for diplopia response [n = 125], and 2 teprotumumab [n = 79] and placebo [n = 83] comparator studies). Treatment with IVMP resulted in a proptosis difference of -0.16 mm (95% CI, -1.55 to 1.22 mm) from baseline to week 12 vs placebo. The proptosis treatment difference between IVMP and teprotumumab of -2.31 mm (95% CI, -3.45 to -1.17 mm) favored teprotumumab. Treatment with IVMP (odds ratio, 2.69; 95% CI, 0.94-7.70) was not favored over placebo in odds of diplopia response; however, teprotumumab was favored over IVMP (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.07-5.03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This meta-analysis suggests that use of IVMP is associated with a small, typically not clinically relevant, change from baseline in proptosis vs placebo, with modest changes in diplopia. While this nonrandomized comparison suggests that use of teprotumumab, compared with IVMP, is associated with greater improvements in proptosis and may be twice as likely to have a 1 grade or higher reduction in diplopia, randomized trials comparing these 2 treatments would be warranted to determine if 1 treatment is superior to the other to a clinically relevant degree.

Improvement of asymmetric thyroid eye disease with teprotumumab.

PURPOSE: Teprotumumab, a specific blocking antibody to the insulin like growth factor 1 receptor, significantly reduced proptosis in patients with thyroid eye disease (TED) in recent clinical trials. Given its specificity, we expect it to demonstrate greater efficacy on the worse affected orbit, in patients with asymmetric TED. Herein, we investigate the differential impact of teprotumumab on the orbits of such patients. METHODS: In this pooled analysis of patients who were enrolled in the recent phase 2 (NCT01868997) and phase 3 (NCT03298867) trials, all patients with asymmetric TED (difference in exophthalmometry of ≥3 mm) were screened for eligibility. The primary outcomes of the trials, proptosis, diplopia and Clinical Activity Score (CAS) response, were evaluated in both orbits of patients who had received treatment or placebo, to examine the differential response from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: From a pooled group of 84 patients randomised to receive teprotumumab and 87 randomised to placebo, 10 (12%) and 12 (14%), respectively, met the inclusion criteria. The teprotumumab-treated patients demonstrated significant reductions in proptosis, CAS and diplopia in both orbits of each patient and this was not seen with placebo. The reduction in proptosis and CAS was significantly greater in the worse affected orbit, improving symmetry. In the placebo arm, while the mean CAS in the study eye reduced over time, proptosis and diplopia did not change in either orbit. CONCLUSION: The findings in this study suggest the differential impact of teprotumumab on orbits that are clinically more affected by TED, suggesting that teprotumumab reduces asymmetry.

Teprotumumab for thyroid eye disease: early response is not required for benefit.

PURPOSE: In recent trials, 50% of patients treated with teprotumumab for thyroid eye disease had significant improvements in proptosis at 6 weeks. However, a small subgroup of patients did not have a significant response by week 12. We examine the outcomes at week 24 in patients from both trials who had little or no proptosis response at week 12. DESIGN: In this post hoc analysis, data from teprotumumab-treated patients in the placebo-controlled randomized phases 2 and 3 trials were reviewed. METHODS: Patients treated with teprotumumab or placebo with a ≤2 mm reduction from baseline in proptosis at week 12 and completed assessments at both the weeks 12 and 24 visits were included. The main outcome measures were a change in proptosis, clinical activity score (CAS) and diplopia in response to teprotumumab therapy at baseline and weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24. RESULTS: From the phases 2 and 3 studies, 24 patients from the treated and placebo groups were included for analysis (48 total). In the teprotumumab group, of the 24 who had no improvement in proptosis (≥2 mm from baseline) at 12 weeks, 15 (63%) demonstrated a clinically significant improvement at week 24. No patients from the 24 placebo patients had a clinically significant improvement in proptosis at 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. At week 12, 22 patients (92%) in the teprotumumab group had a significant reduction in the CAS (≥2 points) and at 24 weeks all patients achieved this reduction. At week 12, 11 (46%) patients from the placebo group had a significant improvement, while 10 (42%) had a significant improvement at 24 weeks. 22 of the 24 patients (92%) in the teprotumumab group had a diplopia grade > 0 at baseline. At week 12, 12 of the 22 (55%) had improvement in diplopia ≥ 1 grade. By week 24, 16 patients (73%) had an improvement in diplopia ≥ 1 grade. In the placebo group, 15 (63%) had significant diplopia. At week 12, 3 (20%) from this group had improvement in diplopia ≥ 1 grade, while at 24 weeks this number rose to 4 (27%). CONCLUSIONS: There is variability in the time taken to manifest a clinically significant response to teprotumumab, some patients my need a longer time to respond.

Early reversible leukoencephalopathy and unilateral sixth cranial nerve palsy in mild COVID-19 infection.

OBJECTIVES: To provide new insights into neurological manifestations of COVID-19. We describe a patient with mild COVID-19 associated with diplopia from right sixth cranial nerve palsy and early diffuse leukoencephalopathy, successfully treated with intravenous methylprednisolone. METHODS: The patient was evaluated for diplopia that occurred 1 day after the onset of fever, myalgia, and headache. A complete neurological workup, including neurological examination, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis with viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR), serum autoimmune encephalitis, and anti-nerve antibodies and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was performed. RESULTS: Clinical examination revealed incomplete right sixth cranial nerve palsy. Brain MRI showed diffuse confluent fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense white matter abnormalities, while CSF analysis showed mild hyperproteinorrachia (61 mg/dL) without pleocytosis. The patients were treated with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone with rapid improvement of neurological symptoms and resolution of CSF and MRI abnormalities. DISCUSSION: Our report shows that COVID-19 may predominantly present with neurological symptoms; furthermore, it argues the notion of leukoencephalopathy as a typical feature of a severe case of the disease. Mechanisms underpinning neurological symptoms in COVID-19 still need to be elucidated; nonetheless, early recognition and prompt management may ensure their improvement or even complete recovery and are therefore recommended.

Diagnostic yields and clinical features of ocular myasthenia gravis.

ABSTRACT: To investigate clinical features and diagnosis process of ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) in ophthalmology department.A total of 36 patients with ptosis or diplopia who had follow-up for at least 3 months between March 2016 and December 2019 were included in this study. Clinical symptoms of patients and the test results were analyzed. According to the positivity of serologic test, these patients were divided into 2 groups (confirmed OMG and possible OMG with relief of symptoms after antimyasthenic treatment) for comparison.Ptosis was present in 12 (33.33%) patients, diplopia was present in 14 (38.89%) patients, and both ptosis and diplopia were present in 10 (27.78%) patients. Acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody (AchR Ab) was positive in 14 (38.89%) of 36 patients and ice test was positive in 15 (71.43%) of 21 patients with ptosis. Unequivocal response to pyridostigmine was observed in 31 (86.11%) patients. For seropositive cases, AchR Ab titer was significantly higher in the group with 2 clinical symptoms than that in the 1 clinical symptom (P = .011).This study presents the usefulness and diagnostic validity of antimyasthenic treatment for OMG, especially seronegative OMG, with detailed symptom analysis.

IgG4-Related Disease With Tuberculosis: A Case Report and Retrospective Review of Patients in a Single Center.

Background: IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently recognized systemic fibro-inflammatory disease of unknown cause involving many organs including pancreas, salivary glands, and lymph nodes. Chronic tuberculosis (TB) infection has been reported in IgG4-RD, but the prevalence of TB infection has not been evaluated in IgG4-RD. Methods: Characterization of a patient with IgG4-RD by physical examination, laboratory tests, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological examination. TB infection was evaluated by medical history, radiological examinations, sputum examinations, tubercular skin test (TST) and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release assay test (IGRA). Medical records of IgG4-RD patients were reviewed in our institute from February 2015 to September 2020 to explore the prevalence of TB infection in IgG4-RD. Results: We described a 40-year-old Chinese man presented with headache and diplopia. Physical examination revealed bitemporal hemianopsia and limited abduction of both eyes. MRI revealed uniformly enhancing mass overlying clivus with dural tail sign. Laboratory data revealed elevation of IgG4 (1.9g/L), and TB-IGRA demonstrated significantly elevated IFN-γ (414.21 pg/ml). The clivus lesion was subtotally removed and IgG4 was strongly positive on immunohistochemical staining. The diagnosis of IgG4-RD was established, and the patient received treatment of corticosteroids, methotrexate, and cyclophosphamide with isoniazid prophylaxis. Consequently, the mass shrank remarkably within 3 months. A similar concurrence of TB disease or latent TB infection (LTBI) and IgG4-RD was present in 17/47 (36.2%) patients in our institute. Conclusion: High frequency of TB/LTBI presented in patients with IgG4-RD. Patients with IgG4-RD and LTBI should be closely monitored for resurgence of TB. Whether TB represents a risk for IgG4-RD should be further investigated in prospective cohort.